Loading...
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 | /* origin: FreeBSD /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_log2.c */ /* * ==================================================== * Copyright (C) 1993 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. * * Developed at SunSoft, a Sun Microsystems, Inc. business. * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this * software is freely granted, provided that this notice * is preserved. * ==================================================== */ /* * Return the base 2 logarithm of x. See log.c for most comments. * * Reduce x to 2^k (1+f) and calculate r = log(1+f) - f + f*f/2 * as in log.c, then combine and scale in extra precision: * log2(x) = (f - f*f/2 + r)/log(2) + k */ #include <math.h> #include <stdint.h> static const double ivln2hi = 1.44269504072144627571e+00, /* 0x3ff71547, 0x65200000 */ ivln2lo = 1.67517131648865118353e-10, /* 0x3de705fc, 0x2eefa200 */ Lg1 = 6.666666666666735130e-01, /* 3FE55555 55555593 */ Lg2 = 3.999999999940941908e-01, /* 3FD99999 9997FA04 */ Lg3 = 2.857142874366239149e-01, /* 3FD24924 94229359 */ Lg4 = 2.222219843214978396e-01, /* 3FCC71C5 1D8E78AF */ Lg5 = 1.818357216161805012e-01, /* 3FC74664 96CB03DE */ Lg6 = 1.531383769920937332e-01, /* 3FC39A09 D078C69F */ Lg7 = 1.479819860511658591e-01; /* 3FC2F112 DF3E5244 */ double log2(double x) { union {double f; uint64_t i;} u = {x}; double_t hfsq,f,s,z,R,w,t1,t2,y,hi,lo,val_hi,val_lo; uint32_t hx; int k; hx = u.i>>32; k = 0; if (hx < 0x00100000 || hx>>31) { if (u.i<<1 == 0) return -1/(x*x); /* log(+-0)=-inf */ if (hx>>31) return (x-x)/0.0; /* log(-#) = NaN */ /* subnormal number, scale x up */ k -= 54; x *= 0x1p54; u.f = x; hx = u.i>>32; } else if (hx >= 0x7ff00000) { return x; } else if (hx == 0x3ff00000 && u.i<<32 == 0) return 0; /* reduce x into [sqrt(2)/2, sqrt(2)] */ hx += 0x3ff00000 - 0x3fe6a09e; k += (int)(hx>>20) - 0x3ff; hx = (hx&0x000fffff) + 0x3fe6a09e; u.i = (uint64_t)hx<<32 | (u.i&0xffffffff); x = u.f; f = x - 1.0; hfsq = 0.5*f*f; s = f/(2.0+f); z = s*s; w = z*z; t1 = w*(Lg2+w*(Lg4+w*Lg6)); t2 = z*(Lg1+w*(Lg3+w*(Lg5+w*Lg7))); R = t2 + t1; /* * f-hfsq must (for args near 1) be evaluated in extra precision * to avoid a large cancellation when x is near sqrt(2) or 1/sqrt(2). * This is fairly efficient since f-hfsq only depends on f, so can * be evaluated in parallel with R. Not combining hfsq with R also * keeps R small (though not as small as a true `lo' term would be), * so that extra precision is not needed for terms involving R. * * Compiler bugs involving extra precision used to break Dekker's * theorem for spitting f-hfsq as hi+lo, unless double_t was used * or the multi-precision calculations were avoided when double_t * has extra precision. These problems are now automatically * avoided as a side effect of the optimization of combining the * Dekker splitting step with the clear-low-bits step. * * y must (for args near sqrt(2) and 1/sqrt(2)) be added in extra * precision to avoid a very large cancellation when x is very near * these values. Unlike the above cancellations, this problem is * specific to base 2. It is strange that adding +-1 is so much * harder than adding +-ln2 or +-log10_2. * * This uses Dekker's theorem to normalize y+val_hi, so the * compiler bugs are back in some configurations, sigh. And I * don't want to used double_t to avoid them, since that gives a * pessimization and the support for avoiding the pessimization * is not yet available. * * The multi-precision calculations for the multiplications are * routine. */ /* hi+lo = f - hfsq + s*(hfsq+R) ~ log(1+f) */ hi = f - hfsq; u.f = hi; u.i &= (uint64_t)-1<<32; hi = u.f; lo = f - hi - hfsq + s*(hfsq+R); val_hi = hi*ivln2hi; val_lo = (lo+hi)*ivln2lo + lo*ivln2hi; /* spadd(val_hi, val_lo, y), except for not using double_t: */ y = k; w = y + val_hi; val_lo += (y - w) + val_hi; val_hi = w; return val_lo + val_hi; } |